Superior Court Judicial Review
500-17-139638-269

Directed energy and ultrasound beams are ongoing from neighboring apartments, from above, from below, on university campuses, combined with mobbing crew participants, gaslighters, threats, different pretenses, .. Federal gov and police corruption, teamwork, ..

Here is our ongoing Superior Court battle progress while enduring this. It’s similar to 2011 The Charbonneaus.

It consists of the Judicial Review, Demand For Administrative File, and a new complaint regarding a strange catch by A.I..

In the QC Police Ethics curtesy English translation there’s a missing important paragraph linked to our demand for the administrative record file.

Another strange issue, that was a bit scary given we can’t do this without A.I., is that Gemini ran into new guard rails.

We’ve had issues with Google regarding censorship and SEO but this is their A.I..

Going through all the documents to draft legal documents, later arguments, Gemini ran into P-1 the complaint above and a long documentation of the events and Havana Syndrome Symptoms on March 28 (if I remember correctly).

It stops everything, analysis, drafts, .. and starts posting long empathic posts. The words Havana Syndrome causes it to do this.

Here it is, the documents in English (They are actually all in French and no we didn’t write them. They are very good.)

==//

COMPLAINT

April 8 2026
QC Police Ethics complaint
1. On March 28 2026 at around 18:45 I called SPVM Station 21. The SPVM Police
Officer identified himself as SPVM Police Officer Petit badge number 213. I believe
that this is a phony name and badge number;
2. Havana Syndrome and human trafficking, homicides.
Sincerely,

==//

JUDICIAL REVIEW

CANADA
PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC
DISTRICT OF MONTRÉAL

SUPERIOR COURT (Civil Division)
Court File No.: 500-17-________
DANNY HUNT
Applicant
v.
THE POLICE ETHICS COMMISSIONER
Defendant
and
SERVICE DE POLICE DE LA VILLE DE MONTRÉAL (SPVM)
Impleaded Party
and
OFFICER “PETIT” (Badge No. 213)
Impleaded Party
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF QUÉBEC
Impleaded Party

APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
(Articles 34, 529, 530, 532 and following of the Code of Civil Procedure, CQLR, c. C-25.01)
IN SUPPORT OF HIS APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW, THE APPLICANT RESPECTFULLY STATES THE FOLLOWING:
I. THE PARTIES AND THE COURT’S JURISDICTION
1. The Applicant, Danny Hunt, is a natural person domiciled and residing at 1804, boulevard Le Corbusier, apartment 507, Laval, Québec, H7S 2N3, and is the complainant in police ethics file reference number PLA 26-0716.
2. The Defendant, the Police Ethics Commissioner (hereinafter the “Commissioner”), is the administrative body vested with statutory authority under the Police Act (CQLR, c. P-13.1) to receive, examine and investigate complaints concerning police officers’ conduct under the Code of ethics of Québec police officers (CQLR, c. P-13.1, r. 1).
3. The Impleaded Party, the Service de police de la Ville de Montréal (hereinafter the “SPVM”), is the municipal police force employing the police officer concerned by the facts in dispute.
4. The Impleaded Party, the officer identified as « Agent Petit », badge number “213,” is the officer who handled the telephone call to SPVM Neighbourhood Police Station 21 on March 28, 2026, at 6:45 p.m.
5. The Impleaded Party, the Attorney General of Québec, is impleaded pursuant to article 76 of the Code of Civil Procedure as the legal representative of His Majesty in right of Québec.
6. The Superior Court of Québec has exclusive jurisdiction to exercise its power of superintendence and judicial review of the legality of any decision, omission or act of the Police Ethics Commissioner, pursuant to articles 34, 529 and 532 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY (FILE PLA 26-0716)
7. On April 8, 2026, the Applicant submitted a formal written police ethics complaint to the Commissioner concerning the conduct of SPVM Officer Petit, badge number 213. The complaint was registered under file number PLA 26-0716 (Exhibit P-1).
8. On July 8, 2026, the Deputy Police Ethics Commissioner, Michelle-Audrey Avoine, issued a unilateral administrative decision refusing to investigate the complaint and ordering the file closed, alleging that the analysis of the information obtained from the police force provided « aucun indice permettant de soutenir les allégations formulées » (Exhibit P-2).
9. On July 21, 2026, the Applicant duly submitted a formal application for review form (Exhibit P-3) within the mandatory 15-day period prescribed by section 169 of the Police Act, producing new and decisive evidence consisting of the official detailed wireless telephone billing statement issued by Rogers Communications (Exhibit P-5).
10. On July 27, 2026, the Commissioner, under the signature of Michel Desgroseilliers, counsel, issued the final decision on the application for review, confirming the initial dismissal and ending the Commissioner’s involvement, on the formulaic ground that the Applicant had detailed « aucun élément » warranting a different conclusion (Exhibit P-4).
11. The Commissioner’s decision of July 27, 2026, constitutes the final decision challenged in this application for judicial review (Exhibit P-4).
III. THE ALLEGED FACTS
12. On March 28, 2026, at approximately 3:35 p.m., the Applicant experienced acute physical discomfort while staying at a hotel in Montréal.
13. On March 28, 2026, at precisely 6:45 p.m., the Applicant telephoned SPVM Neighbourhood Police Station 21 by dialling its official number, 514-280-0121.
14. The officer who answered the call identified himself to the Applicant as « Agent Petit », badge number “213.”
15. During this uninterrupted telephone conversation lasting four (4) full minutes, the Applicant expressly requested that a statement be recorded and that a formal incident report (police report) be opened.
16. Officer “Petit 213” refused to record the Applicant’s statement, refused to open an incident report, and summarily directed him to a hospital on the pretext that the Applicant had neither tools nor evidence.
17. On April 8, 2026, the Applicant formalized his written police ethics complaint, which expressly contained two distinct grounds of complaint (Exhibit P-1):
a) Ground 1: The officer’s use of the name “Petit” and badge number “213,” alleged to be a false identity or fictitious badge number;
b) Ground 2: The failure to record and take police action regarding reports concerning public safety, human trafficking and homicides.
18. In her July 8, 2026 decision closing the file, Deputy Commissioner Michelle-Audrey Avoine closed the matter merely by alleging an absence of any indication within the police service, without placing in the file any CAD (Computer-Aided Dispatch) call log, station duty schedule or officer’s statement (Exhibit P-2).
19. On July 21, 2026, the Applicant produced his detailed Rogers telephone statement (Exhibit P-5), which scientifically and irrefutably establishes that an outgoing call was connected to SPVM Station 21 (514-280-0121) on Saturday, March 28, 2026, at 6:45 p.m., lasting exactly 4:00 minutes.
20. On July 27, 2026, the Commissioner issued a decision definitively closing the file using standard template wording, entirely omitting any analysis, assessment or even mention of the objective telephone statement submitted (Exhibit P-4).
IV. GROUNDS OF LAW
A. BREACHES OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND DEFICIENT INVESTIGATION
(Correctness standard of review)
21. Compliance with the principles of natural justice, procedural fairness and the duty to conduct a thorough investigation is examined under the correctness standard of review.
22. The Commissioner breached the basic duty to conduct a serious preliminary examination by failing to verify the attendance register at Station 21, the call-routing logs and the identity of the officer who took the call on March 28, 2026, at 6:45 p.m.
23. Section 169 of the Police Act confers on the complainant a mandatory right to submit new facts or elements. By remaining silent on the Rogers telephone statement (Exhibit P-5), the Commissioner violated the audi alteram partem rule and rendered the exercise of the right to review purely illusory.
24. Under the Supreme Court of Canada’s leading decision in R. v. Beaudry, 2007 SCC 5, police discretion is not absolute and must be objectively justified in the public interest. The Commissioner committed a major error of law by adopting circular reasoning: the Commissioner used the very administrative omission alleged against the officer—the failure to open an incident file—to conclude that there was no evidence against that same officer.
B. UNREASONABLENESS OF THE CHALLENGED DECISION UNDER THE VAVILOV FRAMEWORK (2019 SCC 65)
25. According to the principles established in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, an administrative decision must be justified, intelligible and transparent, and must rest on a logical chain of analysis attentive to the crucial evidence and the parties’ arguments.
26. The initial decision of July 8, 2026, expressly acknowledges that the Applicant contacted a police officer by telephone and that the officer suggested that he go to the hospital (Exhibit P-2, para. [2]). It is fundamentally illogical and contradictory to declare that there is « aucun indice » without explaining how the acknowledged communication does not correspond to the interaction complained of.
27. The Commissioner rendered an unreasonable decision by stating on July 27, 2026, that the Applicant had detailed « aucun élément » (Exhibit P-4), completely disregarding the key objective evidence (Exhibit P-5) formally establishing the four-minute call to Station 21.
28. The Commissioner seriously breached the duty of responsive justification by simply ignoring Ground 1 of the complaint concerning the use of a false police identity (“Petit 213”) and Ground 2 concerning public safety and human trafficking, unilaterally distorting the subject matter of the dispute into a strictly medical disagreement.
C. BREACHES OF THE CODE OF ETHICS OF QUÉBEC POLICE OFFICERS AND THE POLICE ACT
29. The Commissioner erred in law by failing to analyze the officer’s conduct in light of the mandatory statutory provisions:
a) Sections 48 and 52 of the Police Act: Section 48 imposes the non-discretionary statutory mission of maintaining peace, order and public security, and preventing and repressing crime. Section 52 imposes the obligation to forward and centralize criminal intelligence of public interest. The categorical refusal to open a report concerning reported offences directly contravenes these mandatory obligations;
b) Sections 5 and 8(3) of the Code of ethics of Québec police officers: The fundamental duties to preserve public confidence, act with integrity and avoid any deception expressly prohibit the use of an incorrect, misleading or fictitious name or badge number;
c) Section 7(1) and (2) of the Code of ethics of Québec police officers: The duty not to obstruct the administration of justice and not to conceal or withhold statements relating to reports of criminal offences.
V. RELIEF SOUGHT
FOR THESE REASONS, MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT TO:
GRANT this Application for Judicial Review;
DECLARE that the Police Ethics Commissioner’s decision of July 8, 2026, and the decision on the application for review of July 27, 2026, in file PLA 26-0716 are unreasonable, vitiated by serious breaches of procedural fairness, and absolutely null and void;
ANNUL AND QUASH, for all legal purposes, the final decision rendered on July 27, 2026, by the Police Ethics Commissioner, as well as the initial decision of July 8, 2026;
ORDER that file PLA 26-0716 be referred back to the Police Ethics Commissioner so that the Applicant’s complaint is reconsidered and subjected to a thorough police ethics investigation in accordance with the law, natural justice and the directions in this judgment, with specific instructions to investigate the identity of « Agent Petit (Matricule 213) » and to verify the call logs of SPVM Station 21, the entire matter to be handled by a different commissioner;
THE WHOLE, with costs against the Defendant.
Montréal, August 19, 2026

==//

DEMAN FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

CANADA
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC
DISTRICT OF MONTRÉAL
SUPERIOR COURT (Civil Division)
No. 500-17-139638-269
DANNY HUNT,
Applicant
v.
THE POLICE ETHICS COMMISSIONER,
Defendant
and
SERVICE DE POLICE DE LA VILLE DE MONTRÉAL (SPVM),
Impleaded party
and
OFFICER “PETIT” (Badge No. 213),
Impleaded party
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF QUEBEC,
Impleaded party
APPLICATION IN THE COURSE OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF DOCUMENTS FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TIMETABLE
English translation — quotations retained in their original French
Articles 70 and 530, second paragraph, of the Code of Civil Procedure
IN SUPPORT OF HIS APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT STATES AS FOLLOWS:
1. This application for judicial review challenges the decision on review of July 27, 2026, rendered in police ethics file PLA 26-0716, which upholds the refusal of the complaint issued on July 8, 2026. Copies of the decisions are filed as Exhibits DA-2 and DA-3, corresponding to Exhibits P-2 and P-4 of the application for judicial review.
2. The decision of July 8, 2026, states at paragraph 3: « Nous avons examiné avec soin les allégations de la plainte et procédé à des vérifications auprès des autorités policières concernées. » At paragraph 4, it refers to the analysis of information received from the police service (DA-2, PDF page 1).
3. The decision of July 27, 2026, states: « Ainsi, après analyse de l’ensemble du dossier constitué, je confirme donc la décision initiale et je mets fin à mon intervention. » (DA-3, PDF page 2).

4. The applicant seeks the documents that would allow him to ascertain the factual material underlying these decisions, particularly the police information referred to in the initial decision and the contents of the « dossier constitué » mentioned in the decision on review. He does not ask the Court to presume the content or form of that information.
5. The parties exchanged proposed timetables. The proposal sent by the applicant on October 1, 2026, provided for prior transmission of the administrative record; the proposal returned by counsel for the defendant did not include that step (DA-1, PDF pages 5–9).
6. In his email of October 1, 2026, at 11:10 a.m., Me Marc-André Dufort writes: « De notre côté et avec égards, nous sommes d’avis que la transmission du dossier administratif n’est pas requise lors d’un pourvoi en contrôle judiciaire. » (DA-1, PDF page 4).
7. The same email requests a period of three months for the defendant’s brief after receipt of the applicant’s brief. The disagreement concerning transmission therefore forms part of exchanges that also included proposed deadlines (DA-1, PDF page 4).
8. On October 1, 2026, at 3:29 p.m., the applicant reiterated his request for transmission in writing and indicated that he did not accept the proposed timetable without prior access to the record (DA-1, PDF page 3).
9. On October 2, 2026, at 2:33 p.m., Me Dufort writes: « Je propose que la question de la transmission du dossier administratif soit adressée au greffier spécial le 29 octobre prochain étant donné que nous avons des positions opposées à ce sujet. » (DA-1, PDF page 2).
10. That email proposes submitting the issue to the special clerk. It contains no undertaking that the issue would be decided on October 29, 2026.
11. Following these exchanges, the applicant filed in the Court record a notice of filing dated October 5, 2026, together with the emails and proposed timetables, to bring the disagreement to the Court’s attention and facilitate its referral to a judge, if necessary. A copy of this package is filed as Exhibit DA-1.
12. No joint timetable has been agreed upon. The administrative record whose transmission the applicant seeks has not been disclosed to him as such.
13. This application for transmission is based on article 530, second paragraph, C.C.P. The reference to article 532 in the applicant’s email of October 1, 2026, is not relied upon as a basis for this application.
14. When the matter is presented in Room 2.16, the applicant requests that this contested application, together with the establishment of a timetable, be referred to a Superior Court judge pursuant to article 70 C.C.P. and the directives applicable to the district of Montréal. He asks the judge to determine which documents must be transmitted, the terms of their disclosure, and a timetable that takes into account the resolution of any objections.

15. The documents sought are those in the administrative record relating to the decisions of July 8 and 27, 2026: the complaint and its attachments; the request for review and its attachments; requests for verification sent to the police authorities and the responses received; factual documents, reports and notes placed in the record and submitted to the decision-maker or used to prepare the decisions; and the decisions and their notification.
16. Police reports, call logs or other operational documents are sought only to the extent that they were actually obtained, consulted or considered in the administrative handling of the complaint or its review. This application does not require a new police investigation or the creation of documents that do not exist.
17. The applicant requests an index of the documents transmitted and, for the requested categories not represented in the transmission, an indication specifying whether no document was obtained or placed in the record, or whether a document is being withheld because of an objection.
18. The applicant requests that any objection to transmission or disclosure be specified, together with its legal basis, within the time set by the Court and without disclosing protected content. He asks the Court to determine the procedures and deadlines for deciding objections, as well as any necessary protective measures. He does not seek disclosure contrary to any protection recognized by the Court.
19. Knowledge of the documents ordered to be disclosed is necessary to enable the applicant to prepare his brief effectively regarding the reasons and factual material relied upon in the decisions. He requests that the timetable take account of transmission and any objections.
20. Without conceding that section 139 of the Police Act prevents transmission of the documents sought, the applicant asks the Court to determine its scope to the extent necessary to decide this application. He requests that any objection based on that provision be specified and argued according to the procedures and deadlines set by the Court. He does not contend that article 530 C.C.P. automatically overrides that exemption.
21. If the Court considers that it cannot immediately decide the application for transmission, the applicant requests directions providing for an exchange of written submissions and the scheduling of argument before a judge. Alternatively, insofar as it has not already been disclosed to him, he requests the list of documents and evidence gathered by the Commissioner referred to in section 144 of the Police Act, without equating that list with the entire administrative record.
FOR THESE REASONS, MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT TO:
REFER, when presented before the special clerk in Room 2.16, this contested application, together with the establishment of a timetable, to a Superior Court judge for determination, pursuant to article 70 C.C.P. and the directives applicable to the district of Montréal;
DETERMINE, to the extent necessary to decide this application, the scope of section 139 of the Police Act with respect to the documents sought in the context of this application for judicial review;
GRANT the application for transmission, in whole or in part;

DETERMINE, pursuant to article 530, second paragraph, C.C.P., which documents from administrative record PLA 26-0716 must be transmitted, from among the categories specified in paragraphs 15 and 16;
ORDER the defendant to transmit the documents so identified to the court clerk, with an index and continuous pagination, without delay and no later than fourteen days after notification of the order, or within any other period set by the Court;
ORDER the defendant simultaneously to provide the applicant with a legible copy, subject to any protective measures ordered by the Court;
ORDER that the index identify, without revealing protected content, the documents withheld in whole or in part, the nature of the objection and the legal basis relied upon, and that the defendant specify the categories for which no document was obtained or placed in the record, within the time set by the Court;
SET a deadline for the defendant to specify any objection to transmission or disclosure, together with the procedures and deadlines for the parties’ submissions and the presentation of objections to the Court, without delaying transmission of the uncontested documents whose transmission is ordered;
ALTERNATIVELY, if the Court does not immediately determine the application for transmission, SET the deadlines for exchanging written submissions and the arrangements for argument on this application before a judge;
ALTERNATIVELY, ORDER the defendant to transmit to the applicant, insofar as it has not already been disclosed to him, the list of documents and evidence gathered by the defendant referred to in section 144 of the Police Act, within the time set by the Court;
ESTABLISH a timetable that takes into account transmission of the documents ordered and resolution of the objections, the applicant proposing a period of thirty days after complete disclosure of the documents that the Court orders disclosed to him to notify and file his brief, with the other deadlines and the applicable starting point in the absence of transmission remaining to be determined by the Court;
THE WHOLE, with legal costs to follow the outcome of the application for judicial review.
October 14, 2026
[Signed in the French original]
DANNY HUNT, self-represented applicant

==//

(today’s complaint Oct 22)
PROTECTEUR DU CITOYEN AND QUALITY SERVICES

Complaint concerning service quality
English translation — French quotations retained in their original language
Date: October 20, 2026
To: ..
Subject: Incomplete English translation of the July 27, 2026 decision — PLA 26-0716 / 500-17-139638-269
To the person responsible for service quality at the Office of the Police Ethics Commissioner and to the Québec Ombudsman (Protecteur du citoyen):
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am submitting this complaint jointly to you concerning an omission in the courtesy English translation of the review decision issued on July 27, 2026, in my file PLA 26-0716.
I ask the Commissioner to examine this complaint under the service quality complaint procedure. I ask the Québec Ombudsman to assess the admissibility of my request for intervention, taking into account the pending court proceedings and the internal complaint process initiated by this email.
1. Identified omission
The first paragraph on the second page of the French decision reads as follows:
« Ainsi, après analyse de l’ensemble du dossier constitué, je confirme donc la décision initiale et je mets fin à mon intervention. »
This paragraph appears on page 2 of the attached PDF. There is no corresponding passage in the courtesy English translation, whose second page appears on page 4 of the same PDF.
The translation contains the following disclaimer on page 3 of the PDF:
“In the event of a discrepancy between the Courtesy translation and the French version of the decision, the latter shall prevail.”
I acknowledge that this disclaimer gives precedence to the French version. My complaint concerns the incompleteness of the translation provided and the absence, for readers of that translation, of a passage relevant to understanding the decision.

2. Significance of the omitted passage and judicial context
The omitted passage expressly states that the decision-maker analyzed « l’ensemble du dossier constitué » before confirming the initial decision. This reference is relevant to my request to ascertain the composition of that record, without presuming its contents.
An application for judicial review is pending before the Superior Court under file number 500-17-139638-269. The notice of filing dated October 5, 2026, and the accompanying correspondence concern the disagreement over transmission of the administrative record and establishment of a timetable.
My application in the course of proceedings dated October 14, 2026, seeks transmission of documents from the administrative record and the setting of a timetable. Paragraphs 3 and 4 quote the French passage above and set out the request concerning the « dossier constitué ». The application is scheduled to be presented on October 29, 2026.
I provide this context to explain the significance of the omitted passage and to enable you to assess your jurisdiction. Through this complaint, I seek correction of the translation provided and a review of its quality, without asking you to decide the request for transmission of the administrative record or to change the decision on the merits.
3. Requests to the Commissioner
In light of the commitments in your Declaration of Services to Citizens concerning the provision of complete, understandable, accurate and useful information, I request:
a) acknowledgement of receipt and confirmation that this complaint is being handled;
b) a corrected and complete courtesy English translation of the July 27, 2026 decision, including the omitted paragraph;
c) a written explanation of the circumstances that led to this omission;
d) a check of the completeness of the English translation against the French version, together with confirmation of the results of that check;
e) an indication of any corrective measures adopted to prevent a similar omission from recurring.
I make no assumption about the cause of the omission and do not allege, on this basis alone, that it was intentional.
Given the presentation scheduled for October 29, 2026, I would appreciate receiving the corrected translation before that date, if possible. Otherwise, please advise me of the anticipated timeframe.

4. Request to the Québec Ombudsman
I ask you to determine whether the service quality issue described above can be examined separately despite the pending application for judicial review. I understand that characterizing this matter as a service quality complaint does not, by itself, establish your jurisdiction.
If you consider that you can examine this issue, please advise whether your examination can begin now or whether you must await the Commissioner’s response. If you consider that you cannot intervene, please explain your reasons and, where applicable, indicate the appropriate steps to take.
5. Attachments
For the purposes of examining this complaint, please find attached:
1. DA-3_Decision_revision_2026-07-27.pdf — review decision in French (PDF pages 1–2) and courtesy English translation (PDF pages 3–4), showing the omission;
2. 500-17-139638-269_Demande_transmission_dossier_et_echeancier_2026-10-14.pdf — application in the course of proceedings and accompanying documents, provided to clarify the judicial context and enable an assessment of the admissibility of this complaint;
3. DA-1_Avis_de_depot_et_correspondance_2026-10-05.pdf — notice of filing and earlier correspondence, provided for context.
Please confirm receipt of these documents and advise me in writing of the action taken on this complaint.
Yours faithfully,

Social media keeps changing, different causes, government demands, lawsuits, maybe authoritarian governments, gov corruption, corporate America, organized crime, mobbing crews,

[ mobbing, bossing, workplace places, public places, focused on depletion, homelessness, directed energy and ultrasound type weapons, repeated gang ideation, human trafficking, homicides, retaliation manipulation for gun ctrl too. ]

We’ve had some serious experiences with arrests followed by hosting service glitches (site offline (100% uptime?)), social media like Facebook page deletions and former Twitter suspensions.

[ This combined with more gov and police corruption, teamworking with mobbing crews, fabrications, threats, Havana Syndrome, Heads of Security, Security guards, employees, hostels, neighboring homes, apartments, etc. .. ongoing. ]

After Elon’s purchase of Twitter, now X, public feeds disappeared, our twitter wall featuring accounts of climate change activists like Greta, Leo DiCaprio, UN, etc. Our own account was not visible even after the purchase of the Blue Checkmark $120 “Nothing posted here yet”. It was like this for several years with X being the worst in terms of censorship.

NOTE we can see our account, posts, and got a steady feed of fights, violence, sex, women, and even porn under X and Elon. [ I do sort of like the exploding paint porch packages .. anyways. ]

Twitter was changed into a Gov (free) and News ($) platform under Elon. And the weird feeds also point too what some in the courts claim to be addiction oriented.

A.I. has also made the news regarding Influence Of The Mind, or aiding and abetting .. Instead of mobbing crews?

==// Censorship, Change

This has recently changed, and the changes mirror Facebook. About 4 or 5 recent posts are visible before getting locked with a demand to sign in.

VK, TruthSocial, BlueSky .. remain better choices for public visible social media.

==// Havana Syndrome, Superior Court $308

Ongoing directed energy and ultrasound beams, X-Ray weapon terrorism, .. Dates way back to city police fabricated allegations of Feb 21 2011 [ The Charbonneaus 2011, Superior Court Hon France Charbonneau Oct 21 2011 .. no time to read .. ]

Regarding Havana Syndrome, we are set for new Superior Court (civil court) proceedings on Sept 17 2026.

Regarding something like :
1. Police used a phony name .. ;
2. Havana Syndrome and human trafficking, homicides.

QC Police Ethics are ambiguous, generic, did not address the complaint, did not address the evidence,. It also involves QC Police Ethics dismissal patterns, and one being police can refuse to take complaints, write police reports, etc.

==// SITE UPDATES

The site is up to date but not the News posts, and we have more video clips to add too.

We are purchasing new hosting services this month $, one for this blog.

There was a recent hosting glitch or error on our part that involves renewal of hosting services. Two services auto-renewed when we thought these were set to off, resulting in charges of over $1000 USD on our credit card, fixed and cancelled on the same day, but the result is a loss of about $90 CAD linked to the credit card currency conversions.

No new city police fabricated fines, only a fire extinguisher attack on May 19 2025 .. . Ongoing Havana Syndrome, intense attack at a hostel Mar 28 2026, and from new neighboring apartments $ June 1 2026 .. Sept 6 2026, which requires re-purchasing of shielding materials like steel panels $.

==// Climate Change

Government policies that lead to huge deficits, inflation, (rich get richer $), massive homelessness, toxic drug homicides, violent crimes, (directed energy, ultrasound beams, X-Ray weapon terrorism, city police, heads of security, mobbing crews, human trafficking,) .. gun ctrl (Liberals).

Liberals building pipelines with tax payer money claiming it’s climate action? New taxes for middle class, carbon tax, ..

The point is that Government and mainstream media lies persist regarding economics and tyranny or gov corruption, which impacts freedom of speech and climate change activism.

==// Canada USA Trade Deficits, Oil Exports $

Canada has a trade deficit with the USA due to oil exports and without oil exports this trade deficit is reversed.

The oil monopoly, USA exporting oil and gas, switching to “people can sort of make their own energy now”, .. . Instead of making this issue clear it it twisted into antagonistic and even retaliation ideation, misleading the general population.

Maybe just government and mobbing crew habits.

We’ve added more movie and TV video clips that I’m sure some people will enjoy.

Foundation, a new black hole energy powered death star used to blow away a distant planet or the space gateway cobalt spike energy overload towards the sun that results in a giant energy flare back at the gateway and planet destroying them both.

Is this climate change? It’s part of a planetary apocalypse theme and mankind’s advances in technology. One is an advanced weapon used in galactic tyranny, the other was a space travelling technology used in an act of planetary terrorism. Dramatic scenes, science fiction, politics, tyranny, terrorism, planetary apocalypse, genocide, mass extinction,.

Reign of Fire, hibernating dragons underground that escape to the surface and burn everything leading to mass extinction.

Is this climate change? It does seem to be something like a parody of fossil fuels, rising heat, wildfires, and mass extinction.

Constantine, Hell looks like a wildfire nuke bomb apocalypse. Let’s hope mankind never use these weapons and that it never happens.

Project Hail Mary, see it in IMAX. It’s just something people and movie critics say.

The sun is dying like many others, a planetary mass extinction theme. An outer space science team adventure that includes aliens facing the same threat.

Our reality is science teams around the world worried about climate change, mass extinction, an existential threat, and trying to find solutions.

Buy a heat pump, EV, advocate solar technology for your corporate employer building, a switch from fossil fuel monopoly and pollution to different sources of electricity,.

Rising CO2, heat, wildfires, air pollution, health issues, lost crops, rising seas, will there be a CO2 apocalypse, methane, will there be a food shortage,. These are good questions.

Our sites and CMS are up to date. We continue to work on the SEO part given we don’t seem to rank or exist on google.

And we’ll soon add more 2026 news content for our different news categories.

This summer keep an eye out for wildfire and air pollution, take measures to protect your health. The air pollution is linked to a lot of health issues like heart disease and dementia for example.

Our site is much better and will continue to improve with new news content, movie clips, SEO, improved meta for search engines and A.I. (the new iNet overlord).

The ongoing improvements are mainly due to A.I. and it’s help, and everyone behind this technology, it’s availability for the general population (Copilot, ChatGPT, Gemini, Open A.I., .. ).

Climate change news is not better, still linked to economic misinformation, special interests and gov politics, corruption, censorship. It’s not really fossil fuel corporations. It’s the governments, economics, (monopolies, control, wealth, etc), and linked to phony democracy, oligarchy, “fight oligarchy”. (opinion)

Note that the switch from an oil monopoly is not simple in terms of economics, deflation, misleading and lying to the general population,.

CO2 growth rate is accelerating, ongoing rising heat, droughts, wildfires, disappearing glaciers, melting poles, Amazon turning into a desert, warming oceans, coral death, ocean current slowing and collapse predictions,.

New positive feed back loops that involves oil sands and pollution have been the news recently.

Currently the news are focused on EU farmers protesting free trade with South America, Venezuela invasion, Ski resort disaster (Crans-Montana Switzerland), immigration issues and chaos, promotion of oil and pipelines in Canada, Greta getting arrested at different protests in EU,. It’s winter, homeless issues that seem normal for general population.

Hydrogen and Solar, using excess solar energy that is not added to the electricity grid for credits to create hydrogen fuel cells. It seem a bit strange that no one seems to value the oxygen.

The new data or A.I. centers may soon increase the demand for this independent electricity and the required grid upgrades.

It’s been a while. I’m happy to report that our site is still up and running, and healthy.

The site SEO has been improved.

It was missing important SEO and meta data due to complexity and lack of experience that A.I. helped resolve. SEO is still ongoing especially regarding the MOVIE SCENES sections video object schema, which is an important feature of site similar to the scientific videos in VIDEO PLAYLISTS.

According to A.I. this will help rank and list the video content.

The NEWS section is still very outdated but this will soon change too. The combination of updated content and better SEO should get our site listed on Google and Bing again.

It’s currently not listed or indexed.

It’s also possible that they don’t like the other content linked to the site that involves the government and police, false allegations, fines, (depletion) (The Charbonneaus, The Carons, .. ), crimes against us (thefts and attacks), acts of radiological weapon (Xray, FBI Crawford part 2) terrorism not reported on mainstream media (QC Canada, USA, EU, ), and to the general unaware population.

Ongoing directed energy and ultrasound beams on university campuses, hostels, secret police participants threats and provocations, pretenses of protection, .. “conspiracy theories and aggregated news”.

We disagree.

Our site is much more than this.

1. It may have been unique when it came to having some entertainment media like the movie scene clips, a type of Hollywood activism when movies are related to different climate change or environmental themes, and our site helping to highlight this entertainment activism (activism).

2. And another unique feature to our site that highlights the realities that are not viewed by the general population when it comes to Gov PR and repression, corruption, censorship, (Mobbing, Bossing,), etc.

COP30 has ended. They made several effort to bring attention to the summit, (Natives), and issues but the world seems to be in other ongoing (economic) crisis like the Trump tariffs, switch from the oil monopoly to electricity freedom, solar, wind, etc. Deflation (!)(?). Inflation. Debt ceilings and USA Gov Shutdowns. Canada and it’s Liberal Federal Gov pipelines, ($200 oil trade deficit with USA, which is now an exporter of oil), Liberal Gov environmental deregulation for US and EU investments. Ukraine war. Also Brazil is a serious deforestation country or location with reports that the Amazon is emitting a lot of CO2, drought (world wide), and turning into a desert.

FIFA is in the news today. It will be interesting to see if there’s any visual climate change theme activism that we can highlight and include on our site. With that said I now kick the ball to Trump, Infantino, .. World Cup Start Date: June 11, 2026.

Google Analytics and Bing Webmaster Tools is helping with SEO tips and errors on our site. School category was not displaying properly on PHIA site. The cause, a strange glitch with past menus, CMS versions, categories, newer version of CMS and modules. It’s mostly fixed but the more permanent fix will change all the urls that are indexed on search engines like the current fix.

The issue exists on Climate Change Mass Extinction too. Several categories not displaying correctly.

Our site is highly censored. Years ago TD software had it blocked as a porn site.

The IPCC Report is out very soon. Good news or existential threat to mankind even worse than we thought?

More news on the “DOOMSDAY Glacier” that says it’s worse than they thought, melting faster, more unstable, may collapse. These news updates do not seem to be getting a lot of attention.

Our site is still badly outdated but movie video clips are recent. Many of the news sections need updates. Recently we added 2015 news and videos of the Pope given it’s importance. These were posted in our other blogs, facebook, twitter many years ago but not directly on our site.

Our YouTube Channel Climate Change Mass Extinction has been updated but as previously reported we seem to be highly censored by Google, less by Bing.

Facebook articles can no longer be easily shared with other social media, which in my opinion reduces it’s value as part of our site. Not sure if our Facebook page content appears in searches either.

Similar story with Twitter. We have been censored by twitter, @DHUNTtweets, and under Elon Musk this got worse given it’s no longer pulling our article info like images, meta data, like it does for mainstream media. Elon the social media champion?

VK and Twitter posts are still shareable on other media, between themselves for example.

The Site and Blog are on a new hosting account that expires in 2024.

I’ve watching 1 year old IPCC videos, only two so far, to add directly to our site. The Carbon Deficit NetZero video makes no sense ..

We haven’t posted in our blog although we blog a lot on VK, our VK Wall found here https://climatechangemassextinction.com/vk-home

It seems both CCME and PHIA are highly censored by Google, less so by Bing. Twitter seems to censor any links to these sites while Facebook and VK have no problem pulling article titles, images, and article intro or site name for example.

Recently bought new hosting, renewed domains ($250), ..

More recently we’ve updated our YouTube Channels that were badly outdated since 2014, and added some new movie video clips. https://www.youtube.com/@ClimateChangeMassExtinction

We are posting new articles to related to Climate Change Mass Extinction too.

The site is upgraded, new look, fast, a work in progress. More content needs to be added like the droughts of this summer. Currently it’s mostly articles about climate change being worse than they thought again, unstoppable melting and mass extinction, heading for something similar to the great dying, which has been a main info part of our site thanks to NOVA, PBS, and Pirates (!? .. just kidding) for many years. https://climatechangemassextinction.com/

Videos, we have a new videos page, a big backlog of movie and tv video clips that have different climate change themes. A few have been clipped from recent movies. https://climatechangemassextinction.com/video-scenes

Video Playlists, Video playlists of different climate change issues like droughts, wildfires from 10 years ago, not the recent drought apocalypse in US, EU, China 2022. And video blogs, our long ribbon on climate change patterns that lead to mass extinction, the great dying, ends with omens (?). https://climatechangemassextinction.com/video-playlists

VK Communities (blogs) from previous site are all here: https://climatechangemassextinction.com/vk-home

Twitter Wall, from previous site. The plan is to add EV related feeds and Formula E related feeds, Drivers, Teams, .. A menu, different Twitter Wall for each. I like the idea, doing it for myself, others who might like this too. Can take 1 minute to start loading all the feeds. https://climatechangemassextinction.com/twitter-wall

Events, there still no content on this page but one of the first will most likely be the upcoming COP27. https://climatechangemassextinction.com/events-home

Enjoy.

The new site is online, working well. Everything, twitter, facebook, vk, .. is integrated into the site. It’s still a work in progress regarding it’s layout.

This summer there’s been several wildfires, state of emergency, we missed many of these posts, include new science posts. We will add more content soon, the new science posts, new EVs, and movie clips soon.

There’s a more obvious EVENT catogory, plan to add COP27 soon. www.COP27.eg Nov 22 2022

SARCASM

I recently told friends on Facebook “They’ve been lying about climate change but if they keep saying it’s worse than they thought every 3 months like they’ve been doing they’ll soon catchup to the truth. (sarcasm)”.

Recent News (Sat July 30th)

‘Soon it will be unrecognisable’: total climate meltdown cannot be stopped, says expert. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jul/30/total-climate-meltdown-inevitable-heatwaves-global-catastrophe

Danny Hunt 360, 356, 369
Ongoing high surveillence, Gov & Police corruption, fabrications, allegations, fines, secret police participants, mobbing, .. . Info is on PHIA Site. The most recent event is the 2nd auto-guilty victory for the Dec 2 2020 2am STM SPVM fines. Secret police have been saying, insinuating (including the city judge) that the judges verdict of refusing to repeal the auto-guilty verdict can be appealed. Appeal Court $369. The new US Climate Change bill $369 billion.